These twelve extracts are taken from amongst some seventy-three
rules, to enumerate which would be useless, as they would be meaningless
in Europe. But even these few are enough to show the immensity
of the difficulties which beset the path of the would-be "Upasaka,"
who has been born and bred in Western lands.2
All Western, and especially English, education is instinct with
the principle of emulation and strife; each boy is urged to learn
more quickly, to outstrip his companions, and to surpass them
in every possible way. What is mis-called "friendly rivalry"
is assiduously cultivated, and the same spirit is fostered and
strengthened in every detail of life.
With such ideas "educated into" him from his childhood,
how can a Westerner bring himself to feel towards his co-students
"as the fingers on one hand"? Those co-students, too,
are not of his own selection, or chosen by himself
from personal sympathy and appreciation. They are chosen by his
teacher on far other grounds, and he who would be a student must
first be strong enough to kill out in his heart all feelings
of dislike and antipathy to others. How many Westerners are ready
even to attempt this in earnest?
And then the details of daily life, the command not to touch even
the hand of one's nearest and dearest. How contrary to Western
notions of affection and good feeling! How cold and hard it seems.
Egotistical too, people would say, to abstain from giving pleasure
to others for the sake of one's own development. Well, let those
who think so defer, till another lifetime, the attempt to enter
the path in real earnest. But let them not glory in their own
fancied unselfishness. For, in reality, it is only the seeming
appearances which they allow to deceive them, the conventional
notions, based on emotionalism and gush, or so-called courtesy,
things of the unreal life, not the dictates of Truth.
But even putting aside these difficulties, which may be considered
"external," though their importance is none the less
great, how are students in the West to "attune themselves"
to harmony as here required of them? So strong has personality
grown in Europe and America, that there is no school of artists
even whose members do not hate and are not jealous of each other.
"Professional" hatred and envy have become proverbial;
men seek each to benefit himself at all costs, and even the so-called
courtesies of life are but a hollow mask covering these demons
of hatred and jealousy.
In the East the spirit of "non-separateness" is inculcated
as steadily from childhood up, as in the West the spirit of rivalry.
Personal ambition, personal feelings and desires, are not encouraged
to grow so rampant there. When the soil is naturally good, it
is cultivated in the right way, and the child grows into a man
in whom the habit of subordination of one's lower to one's higher
Self is strong and powerful. In the West men think that their
own likes and dislikes of other men and things are guiding principles
for them to act upon, even when they do not make of them the law
of their lives and seek to impose them upon others.
Let those who complain that they have learned little in the Theosophical
Society lay to heart the words written in an article in the Path
for last February: "The key in each degree is the aspirant
himself." It is not "the fear of God"
which is "the beginning of Wisdom," but the knowledge
of SELF which is WISDOM ITSELF.
How grand and true appears, thus, to the student of Occultism
who has commenced to realise some of the foregoing truths, the
answer given by the Delphic Oracle to all who came seeking after
Occult Wisdom--words repeated and enforced again and again by
the wise Socrates:--MAN KNOW
THYSELF. . . .
__________
SOME CORRESPONDENCE
PRACTICAL OCCULTISM
"In a very interesting article in last month's number entitled
'Practical Occultism' it is stated that from the moment a 'Master'
begins to teach a 'chela' he takes on himself all the sins of
that chela in connection with the occult sciences until the moment
when initiation makes the chela a master and responsible in his
turn.
"For the Western mind, steeped as it has been for generations
in 'Individualism,' it is very difficult to recognize the justice
and consequently the truth of this statement, and it is very much
to be desired that some further explanation should be given for
a fact which some few may feel intuitively but for which they
are quite unable to give any logical reason."--S. E.
EDITORS' REPLY. The best
logical reason for it is the fact that even in common daily life,
parents, nurses, tutors and instructors are generally held responsible
for the habits and future ethics of a child. The little unfortunate
wretch who is trained by his parents to pick pockets in the streets
is not responsible for the sin, but the effects of it fall heavily
on those who have impressed on his mind that it was the right
thing to do. Let us hope that the Western Mind, although being
steeped in Individualism," has not become so dulled thereby
as not to perceive that there would be neither logic nor justice
were it otherwise. And if the moulders of the plastic mind of
the yet unreasoning child must be held responsible, in this world
of effects, for his sins of omission and commission during his
childhood and for the effects produced by their early training
in after life, how much more the "Spiritual Guru"? The
latter taking the student by the hand leads him into, and introduces
him to a world entirely unknown to the pupil. For this world is
that of the invisible but ever potent CAUSALITY,
the subtle, yet never-breaking thread that is the action, agent
and power of Karma, and Karma itself in the field of divine mind.
Once acquainted with this no adept can any longer plead ignorance
in the event of even an action, good and meritorious in its motive,
producing evil as its result; since acquaintance with this
mysterious realm gives the means to the Occultist of foreseeing
the two paths opening before every premeditated as unpremeditated
action, and thus puts him in a position to know with certainty
what will be the results in one or the other case. So long, then,
as the pupil acts upon this principle, but is too ignorant to
be sure of his vision and powers of discrimination, is it not
natural that it is the guide who should be responsible
for the sins of him whom he has led into those dangerous regions?
__________
IS THERE NO
HOPE?
I think, after reading the conditions necessary for Occult study
given in the April number of LUCIFER, that
it would be as well for the readers of this magazine to give up
all hopes of becoming Occultists. In Britain, except inside a
monastery, I hardly think it possible that such conditions could
ever be realised. In my future capacity of medical doctor (if
the gods are so benign) the eighth condition would be quite exclusive;
this is most unfortunate, as it seems to me that the study of
Occultism is peculiarly essential for a successful practice of
the medical profession.3
I have the following question to ask you, and will be glad to
be favoured with a reply through the medium of LUCIFER.
IS it possible to study Occultism in Britain?
Before concluding, I feel compelled to inform you that, I admire
your magazine as a scientific production, and that I really and
truly classify it along with the "Imitation of Christ"
among my text books of religion.
DAVID CRICHTON.
Marischall College, Aberdeen.
EDITORS' REPLY.--This
is a too pessimistic view to entertain. One may study with profit
the Occult Sciences without rushing into the higher Occultism.
In the case of our correspondent especially, and in his future
capacity of medical doctor, "the Occult knowledge of simples
and minerals, and the curative powers of certain things in Nature,"
is far more important and useful than metaphysical and psychological
Occultism or Theophany. And this he can do better
by studying and trying to understand Paracelsus and the two Van
Helmonts, than by assimilating Patanjali and the methods of Taraka
Raja Yoga.
It is possible to study "Occultism" (the Occult
sciences or arts is more correct) in Britain, as on any other
point of the globe; though owing to the tremendously adverse conditions
created by the intense selfishness that prevails in the country,
and a magnetism which is repellent to a free manifestation of
Spirituality--solitude is the best condition for study.
__________
A SUBSEQUENT NOTE
[In Lucifer for June, l889, H.P.B. printed a letter questioning
the "practicality" of certain of the requirements of
chelaship, as given in "Practical Occultism." She made
the following reply in a footnote:]
Chelaship has nothing whatever to do with means of subsistence
or anything of the kind, for a man can isolate his mind entirely
from his body and its surroundings. Chelaship is a state of
mind, rather than a life according to hard and fast
rules on the physical plane. This applies especially to the earlier,
probationary period, while the rules given in Lucifer for
April last pertain properly to a later stage, that of actual occult
training and the development of occult powers and insight. These
rules indicate, however, the mode of life which ought to be followed
by all aspirants so far as practicable, since it
is the most helpful to them in their aspirations.
It should never be forgotten that Occultism is concerned with
the inner man who must be strengthened and freed from the
dominion of the physical body and its surroundings, which must
become his servants. Hence the first and chief necessity
of Chelaship is a spirit of absolute unselfishness and devotion
to Truth; then follow self-knowledge and self-mastery. These are
all-important; while outward observance of fixed rules of life
is a matter of secondary moment.
Lucifer, April, May, 1888
June,1889
1 So holy is the connection thus formed deemed in the
Greek Church, that a marriage between god-parents of the same
child is regarded as the worst kind of incest, is considered illegal
and is dissolved by law; and this absolute prohibition extends
even to the children of one of the sponsors as regards those of
the other.
back to text
2 Be it remembered that all "Chelas,"
even lay disciples, are called Upasaka until after their first
initiation, when they become lanoo-Upasaka. To that day, even
those who belong to Lamaseries and are set apart, are considered
as "laymen."
back to text
3 By "successful practice" I mean, successful
to everybody concerned.
back to text